Saturday, November 29, 2014

A Few Things About Interstellar.....

So, I watched Interstellar yesterday (loved it, by the way) and I noticed a few things:

-Hans Zimmer is scoring movies as if he's trying to dethrone John Williams.

-When your movie is so star powered, Matt Damon is the unbilled star, that's a REALLY star powered movie.

-Matthew McConaughey's character, Joseph Cooper, for him to be the "practical one," was like the happy go lucky version of Rustin Cohle from True Detective.

-As right brained as Christopher Nolan's work tends to be....he's kind of a big softie. For a space movie, the teary eyed close-up scenes seemed to steal the show. The scene where Matthew McConaughey is holding his weeping, angry daughter seems to be the moment that serves as the driving force for everything they both do from that point onward. The movie spends every bit as much time on philosophy and feelings as it does on quantum physics. Anne Hathaway has a whole monologue where she ponders whether or not love can transcend time and space (which is the sort of thing, I'll admit, I'm a sucker for in movies). Having said that....

-If Neil Degrasse Tyson can learn to let go, we can all learn to let go. We are a cynical generation that can't enjoy a movie if it has the smallest of plotholes that don't really matter to the story as a whole. If America's Science Czar can note the scientific inconsistencies and still enjoy a movie that, in its own way, embraces love as a science unto itself, so can we. Granted, let's not get crazy. When you have too many plotholes that leave you asking wildly unnecessary questions, you end up with Transformers 2 and 3. Still, learning to let go is an integral part of the moviegoing experience.

Friday, November 21, 2014

The Week In Geek 11/19/14

My reviews for the week are up and available on Black Nerd Problems for your viewing pleasure. You know the drill. As always, feel free to love, hate, comment, like, share as you see fit. This week, I took a look at.....

Uncanny X-Men: Brian Bendis' work doesn't move as fast for some as they'd like but honestly, I think this particular story arc is probably the strongest structured of his tenure so far. I really do hope both X-titles delve more into the Fall of Hank McCoy. It's actually reminiscent of Doctor Strange's arc recently where he started channeling the Dark Arts to be more powerful which was awesome (would have been more awesome had Marvel not done that already during World War Hulk). This story has been powerful because we've seen certain characters (Cyclops, Iceman, Beast) at their most vulnerable and in a book where the principle characters are basically family, that's an important aspect to show, moreso than these grand, repetitive action beats every 9 pages.

Batman Eternal: You would think Batman would have learned his lesson with making heavy artillery for all these Defcon 1 scenarios just for someone to steal from under his nose. Alas, Gotham is under siege once again thanks to a Batman plan. And, of course, Wayne Enterprises is going to up to its nose in legal red tape because Bruce Wayne funds Batman Inc. And Batman wouldn't be Batman if he didn't leave Lucius Fox holding the bag.

Sunday, November 16, 2014

When Creator Credit Matters

I'm going to regret this, but I get approached in public with questions and topic pitches enough that I'm taking them as serious requests to discuss here in the blog.

So, a coworker and I were talking comics and Rob Liefeld's name came up. My coworker asked, as many people (including myself) do, how he keeps getting work. I corrected him by saying that, in fairness, he only keeps getting work with DC because they're the main ones that keep banking on him against all odds (If you need proof, ALL of his New 52 books failed within 8 issues at the beginning of the reboot). As far as Marvel goes, he doesn't do much for them anymore but then again, he doesn't really have to when he keeps beating his chest about how he created Cable and Deadpool.

So, this left my coworker wondering: Does laying claim to being "the creator of..." really hold a lot of weight in comics? And it's a good question. After all, the praise fans shower comic creators with doesn't necessarily translate in every industry the same way. Just ask 90% of game developers.

Honestly, depending on who you ask in the comic industry itself, you might even get mixed answers there, too.


(Before I go on, let me take this moment to say that in terms of compensation and publishers' treatment of their talent, creator credit should ALWAYS matter and that DC treatment of Gerry Conway in this case is indefensible. There's just no two ways about it. However, what we're discussing the semantics of how much it should/shouldn't matter from a reader's perspective.)

Now, my coworker isn't necessarily a die-hard comic reader, but from the outside looking in, his question is completely valid. After all, let's say I create a character that ends up having some minimal success if any at all. Someone else like Scott Snyder comes along, completely retools every aspect of my character and suddenly, it's a huge success and a household name. Do I still get lay claim to being the pioneer in this situation?

Answer: Sure, but not really. In other words, if my character ends up being a cartoon, do I have the right to have my name under the creator credits? Absolutely. Without question. Unless, of course, the studio decides to say something like "based on story written by Scott Snyder" so they can directly credit the mind behind the version people actually liked.

For the ideal situation, let's take Spider-Man. Even in uninitiated circles, you'd have to go pretty far and wide to find someone who didn't know that Stan Lee created Spider-Man. No matter who else writes him and receives tons of well deserved praise for their take on the character (Dan Slott, JMS, Brian Bendis), Stan Lee is the heart and soul of Spider-Man. Why, you ask? Because no matter what changes they made to him or what different avenues, they take him down (give him Spider Cancer, magic totem powers, give his life to kill Norman Osborn, Doctor Spiderpus, selling his marriage to Satan, whatever), all of those stories usually wrap with Spider-Man, perhaps a little wiser and worn for the experience, going back to factory settings. As in "how Stan Lee intended him."

You can even repeat this with Superman. Yeah, we all know he's had a few breaks from the norm

Now, let's plug Rob Liefeld in this formula. Liefeld will forever be tied to Cable and Deadpool mainly because he himself will never let us forget that he created Cable and Deadpool. But as many hands as Deadpool has been in, can we really say that the character as we know him now (basically, the Daffy Duck of Marvel Comics) compared to his first appearances in X-Force and New Mutants really what Liefeld seemed to have in mind? I don't know because I'm not actually in Rob Liefeld's mind, but it sure doesn't seem like it. In fact, speaking of X-Force, another one of Liefeld's brain children, if you look at the line up, their purpose, really anything about them....does the X-Force most people know X-Force to be look anything like the one Liefeld started us off with? Probably not.

So all in all, does being "the creator of..." really matter? Answer: It depends. (Unless you're Rob Liefeld, in which case, not really)

Saturday, November 15, 2014

The Week In Geek 11/12/14

My reviews for the week are available on Black Nerd Problems for your viewing pleasure. Feel free to love them, hate them, comment, share them as you so please. This week, I took a look at....

Batman: The Joker's return is likely the best highlight of the week. Snyder is leaving a terrific and unique fingerprint on the Batman mythos that we'll be talking about in ten years guaranteed, but more importantly, as a Superman fan, I have to point out that Batman said it himself, "If Superman wanted to kill you, there's probably nothing that could stop him." There. He admitted it. He said it himself. It's officially canon.

Batman Eternal: I have to say I do love the New 52 idea of the Spoiler, a kid who deals in information throughout Gotham, stays a step ahead of everyone (including Batman) and feuds with her C-list supervillain father. That said, I really enjoyed her teaming up with Batman to throw down against Hush only to pull Batman's own disappearing trick in him.

Thor: I love that the Thor's ancient magic hammer basically comes with built-in tutorials and helps you learn how to use it. Also, I'm sticking firm to my theory that the new Thor is actually Odinson's SHIELD agent girlfriend, Roz Solomon, but listen, guys, don't start emailing me the plotholes in my theory. It's just a theory. Besides, plotholes or not, there's precedent for EVERYTHING in the comics.

Axis : I don't even have notes on this book. It's getting worse and worse by the week.

Saturday, November 8, 2014

So...Whatever Happened to Elseworlds?

"I'm just saying, guys, Cap never has to
chase naked people."
So, this week, the big announcement went out that Marvel would be doing a major crossover with Attack on Titan. No, I'm not kidding. The "female" Titan from the series will be attacking New York City so it'll be up to the superhero citizens (of which there are many) to stop it before it...umm...kills people, I guess. At first my reaction was, "Okay, but why?" Did anyone ask for this? I mean, I knew Attack on Titan was really popular, but I didn't know it had reached Random 90s Style Crossover Status. I also didn't realize that Marvel was moving so fast towards Total Media Saturation (imagine that I said that in my Spock voice). But then, the real question occurred to me: Why isn't DC doing this?

I mean, I can't be the only person who remembers when this kind of shit was their bread and butter. DC Elseworlds has been around for decades (and yes, I'm counting the years before it was an official imprint) in one way or another, always making a much bigger splash than Marvel's What If? stories even though, to be fair, that's really an apples/oranges comparison (What If stems from an existing place in Marvel's canon where Elseworlds stories exist in a whole different universe). And there are plenty of notable cases where, although they're not considered canon in the main DC Universe, some Elseworlds stories are still considered gospel among fans. Despite their failed attempts to fold it into the existing timeline, Kingdom Come is STILL hailed by many (including myself) as one of the greatest Superman stories of all time.

The Dark Knight Returns, though it is STILL not counted as Elseworlds for some reason (I suspect DC is still looking for an opening to make this fit within the main timeline), is the source for a lot of how we view Batman today. The story planted the seeds necessary for Tim Burton and Anton Furst to take Batman out of the '66 Adam West version pop culture had known him for and into the gritty, gothic wonderland we know him and Gotham for now.

With all that said, it's really weird that DC doesn't seem to put a whole lot of effort into Elseworlds. Now, I can understand not seeing anymore of the company crossovers (remember the mid/late 90s when it looked like Marvel and DC might pretend to get along?) since it is entirely likely that DC has burned so many bridges with their "Conquer or Copy" initiative that Marvel or any other self respecting major publisher would rather sell their left testicles to One Direction before ever working with them. But playing around with their characters (usually Batman and Superman), giving readers exciting alternatives within their own company is one of those perks that made DC itself that much more fun. In the era of the New 52, not having that around anymore leaves them feeling sort of rigid....which seems to be the one problem DC never seems to have ANY interest in fixing.

I get that alternate universes can make it confusing when you're trying to invite new readers in from the movie theaters (even though the New 52 is now up three different Earths and an ongoing Grant Morrison series about parallel dimensions). I even get that DC's trying to align their movies and their comics to a point where the graphic novels are just movie companions. I would, however, feel a little better about it if they could at least pretend they were doing more than streamlining their brand for the sake of blatant cash grabs. Then again, I could be wrong.

Saturday, November 1, 2014

Why Starlight Is So Awesome

Disclaimer: Yes, there are minor spoilers in my explaining the plot, but for the most part, they're confined to Issue One. Of a six part miniseries. So, I don't consider it a big deal. But there are spoilers. Enjoy.

With all the big news happening between the Big Two, one of the great things that slipped through the cracks in the past couple of weeks was that Starlight finally ended. Now, I realize that there are several people who didn't bother with this comic once they realized Mark "Put That In Your Shipping Date And Smoke It" Millar was writing it. I also realize there were people who gave up on it at some point because with Mark Millar, it's only a matter of time before you end up waiting three months for the story wrap up. Well, I'm happy to report that those of you who though Millar wouldn't come through on time (myself included) were wrong and those of you who didn't give this a shot in the first place really missed out on some good reading.

No matter how you feel about Millar's work (no, I'm not going to bring up Civil War because everytime you talk about what worked and didn't work with Civil War, you find yourself in an hour long debate about Civil War and I'm way too sober for that), you should take it as a high recommendation on my part in saying that this is some of his best stuff by far. The main complaints that come from a lot of the comics Millar writes is that:

a). They're overly cynical- Remember the time Iron Man, maybe the most irresponsible superhero of all time, was put in charge of the government oversight of all superheroism? Or the time in Ultimate Comics when the Hulk was a black drug dealer named Tyrone Cash? Or when Kick-Ass turned out to be Millar taking a piss at cosplayers, characterizing them as sociopathic jerks detached from reality.

b). They get away from their own points.- Remember when Civil War started off with the Superhero Registration Act in place, putting certain heroes on the run as enemies of the state and then ENDED with the Superhero Registration Act in place, putting certain heroes on the run as enemies of the state.

c). They spend a lot of time deconstructing superhero culture- Wanted: What if the bad guys had already won decades ago and were just ruling the world out of sheer boredom? Civil War: What if the government got involved because superheroes were a bunch of reckless glory hounds breaking shit all the time (even though they've been getting the job done for 40 years prior to Civil War)? Nemesis: What if Batman were the greatest villain ever?

Well, Millar rails against a lot of his worst habits except (c) because Starlight is a deconstruction (and really, only a minor one) of old school, pulp space opera heroes like Flash Gordon, John Carter and Buck Rogers. Duke McQueen is what I imagine Captain America would grow up to be like if he ever aged. A well-meaning, ass kicking old war horse who has a serious problem with bullies. As a young man, McQueen was an Air Force pilot who'd been sucked out halfway across the galaxy to a remote planet, Tantalus. While there, he'd fought alongside the people there to defeat an evil tyrant and liberate their world. He finally went home as their greatest hero. Of course, when he returned...nobody here on Earth believed him. Nobody except his loving wife.

Many years later, his kids are grown adults who ignore him almost completely, sick of his outer space tales, his wife has passed and he finds himself trying to adjust to his life as an old man with awkward results at best. One day, he receives a visit from some kid claiming he's from Tantalus and that his world needs McQueen once again.

In Starlight, Millar finds a more nuanced, mature voice than we're used to from the writer of Wanted. His characters, even the minor ones, even the evil ones, all feel genuine on one level or another with less of his trademark bravado. This is all most notably so in the case of our hero.

I apologize in advance, but for this point I'm making, the best example I can come up with is The Expendables. This movie was one of my least favorite cinematic experiences EVER in my 31 years of owning a pair of eyes because it didn't completely deliver on what was promised. If you'd believed early marketing, you'd have thought you were getting a bunch of old tough guys shaking off the cobwebs, showing the youngsters how it's done. And in fairness, there was some of that, but there was also a LOT of whining. I swear there was a whole five minutes where Jet Li went on a whole diatribe about how much it sucks to be short. The thing a lot of movie writers don't seem to understand (aside from the fact that whining is NOT always the same as actual character development) is that when your lead character can swordfight with space pirates or fly a cargo plane into heavy gunfire, whining doesn't make your character relatable or "an everyman." It kinda makes him a pussy.

Duke McQueen understands this a lot. Granted, he has a hard time believing all of this is showing up right at this time in his life, but he never truly resists. I mean what does have to complain about. He's still pretty spry, he's built like a linebacker and he has a stature erected in his honor. Any reservation he has about taking up the "hero" mantle again fade away fast. McQueen is rarely unsure of himself or a stumbling over his words. You won't find a scene where he's captured by the enemy, void of hope, doubting whether he was ever of sound mind to take this adventure on again. He knows the people fighting behind him can't afford to hear that shit or else nothing will get done. He doesn't just believe in himself but also his ability to inspire other people to save themselves.

Because, ultimately, whether it's Batman always believing there's a way to win even after all options have been exhausted, Superman's tireless belief in the better angels of humanity's nature or Spider-Man's belief in doing what's right even when it sucks and people may hate him for it....belief is one of the greatest abilities a hero can have.

In this same regard, the story itself carries that same virtue. Rarely rude, gory, vulgar or cynical (all of which are things often associated with Millar), Starlight ends up being less of a send-up of an old genre and becomes a worthy successor. Though the tough old swashbuckler never questions his ultimate purpose, Millar, doesn't ask if heroes like this still exist so much as questions whether or not we still have the capacity to believe in them. And, at their heart, this is one of the primary functions of comics (the truly good ones, anyway). And that's what Starlight is: a return to belief. Because we can always use a little more of that, right?